How Chargebacks Work in the Indian Banking and Financial System: An In-Depth Expert Explanation

As the Indian digital payments landscape continues to evolve, chargebacks form part of the trust and accountability framework that supports this rapidly expanding industry. As more and more people in urban and semi-urban areas in India begin using credit cards, debit cards, and online payments, structured mechanisms to protect consumers will be required by the evolving digital payment system.

Chargebacks provide consumers with a way to formally dispute a transaction and obtain a refund when something has not gone as planned; however, while the end result appears simple, the chargeback process involves a number of detailed rules, multi-party processes, and other factors that are required to create a balanced approach to consumer rights, merchant interests, banks’ risks, and regulatory oversight.

A merchant’s decision to refund a customer is always a voluntary act and not part of the chargeback process. The chargeback process takes place between banks and is facilitated and governed by the rules established by the card networks. The card networks (Visa, Mastercard, and RuPay) have set out a specific chargeback framework in India, along with the customer grievance regulations stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which help to ensure that customers are provided with safe electronic payment options.

The detailed section that follows provides further details on how to understand the chargeback process in India from a high-level perspective, how the chargeback process works between the parties involved, and the laws and regulations that govern this process, how long it takes to complete a chargeback, what situations typically lead to a chargeback, and the best practices for resolving any disputes before submitting for a chargeback.

​

Chargeback Definition and Purpose

Chargebacks refer to cardholder-initiated disputes about a card transaction with the cardholder’s bank. In general, a chargeback occurs when the cardholder assigns blame to the card issuer for a transaction that he or she believed was unauthorized, inaccurate, or unfair, and was either unable or unwilling to work directly with the merchant.

The primary reason chargebacks exist is to protect consumers from financial loss and provide consumer confidence in the use of electronic payments. In addition, chargebacks can act as an incentive for merchants to conduct business in an ethical manner, including accurate billing, prompt response to customer inquiries, and resolving customer concerns.

From a broader perspective, chargebacks create a system of checks and balances that hold everyone responsible for their actions, beginning with the card issuer and ending with post-sale customer service.

​

The Difference Between a Refund and a Chargeback

Although refunds and chargebacks both result in money being returned to the cardholder, they are fundamentally different processes.

A refund is initiated by the merchant, usually after a product return, service cancellation, or billing correction. It is processed through normal payment settlement systems and does not involve dispute resolution.

A chargeback, on the other hand, is initiated by the cardholder through the issuing bank. It involves investigation, evidence review, and formal communication between banks and payment networks. Chargebacks are used when refunds are refused, delayed, or disputed, or when transactions are fraudulent.

Knowing that there is a difference between a product being returned for warranty or quality concerns and a chargeback will help all involved.

​

parties resolve the matter more easily while limiting additional expenses to all parties involved.

Chargebacks involve many different participants working together to perform distinct roles throughout the payment processing ecosystem.

Cardholders initiate the chargeback process. They also supply the necessary documentation to the issuer, providing evidence as to why a chargeback should occur.

An issuing bank is a financial institution that provides credit or debit cards to consumers. The issuing bank represents the consumer during the chargeback dispute process, adjudicates the merits of the dispute under card network rules, and handles communication with all other parties involved in the chargeback process.

Acquiring banks provide merchants with payment acceptance services. The acquiring bank receives chargeback requests from issuing banks and relays the information to the merchants.

The merchant is the business that accepts the card payment and provides goods or services. The merchant may either accept the chargeback or contest it by submitting evidence.

Chargeback rules and regulations are set by the card networks. They set standard reason codes, timelines, documentation requirements, and arbitration processes in order to provide consistency across Banks and countries.

All involved parties have to remain within designated parameters in order to provide a fair and expedient resolution.

 

Regulatory and Legal Context in India

In India, chargebacks do not operate under a single standalone law. Instead, they function within a combined framework of regulatory guidance and contractual network rules.

As directed by RBI, banks need to have appropriate systems in place to resolve customer complaints and to provide protection against any electronic transactions that were not authorized by that customer.RBI also provides a time frame during which banks must notify their customers of a complaint, conduct a diligent investigation, and resolve the complaint within a reasonable period of time.

However, the mechanisms to operate chargebacks are established primarily through the card networks. The Visa, Mastercard, and RuPay networks provide extensive rulebooks regarding the operation of chargebacks and how disputes should be settled. Banks in India that participate in these networks are contractually obligated to adhere to these rulebooks.

This two-part system provides both regulatory oversight and operational uniformity.

​

An In-Depth Look at Chargeback Lifecycle.

A cardholder who sees an irregular charge on their bank card statement or in their transaction history (such as a fraudulent charge, wrongly billed amount, or something that was supposed to be refunded but has not yet been) initiates a chargeback by reporting it to their issuing bank via a bank-powered application, telephone call to the bank, email, or go to a branch of the issuing bank and present the issue there.

At this point, customers must provide all necessary information, including the unique details about the transaction in question and any other documentation to support their claim.

Next, the issuer of the credit card performs an initial determination regarding the dispute and whether it falls within the guidelines and rules created by the credit card issuer associations. This assessment process involves verifying that the transaction is a valid transaction, verifying the cardholder’s transaction history, and verifying that the proper time span is followed.

If the dispute is valid, the issuer assigns an appropriate reason code and formally raises the chargeback through the card network. The disputed amount may be provisionally credited to the cardholder, depending on bank policy and dispute type.

The card network forwards the chargeback to the acquiring bank, which notifies the merchant. The merchant is given an opportunity to accept or contest the chargeback by providing evidence.

The issuer reviews the merchant’s response and makes a decision. If disagreement persists, the case may proceed to arbitration, which is the final stage of dispute resolution.

​

Chargeback Categories and Reason Codes

Chargebacks are categorized using standardized reason codes defined by card networks. These codes identify the nature of the dispute and determine the rules that apply.

There are many variations of chargebacks. Some common categories of chargebacks are fraud or unauthorised charges, failure to receive products or services, Double Billing, Wrong Amounts Charged, Cancellations and Refunds not issued, and Faulty Product or not as described.

The documentation needed to substantiate each type of chargeback varies. Therefore, it is important to correctly classify the chargeback for the correct supporting documentation and timelines.

​

The Role of Documentation and Evidence in Chargeback Disputes

Documentation will determine how the chargeback will be settled. Cardholders will be required to provide documentation as evidence for their dispute. This documentation may include receipts, order confirmations, communication records with merchants, shipping information, and screenshots where applicable.

Merchants contesting chargebacks will be required to provide evidence that the transaction was a valid transaction. Merchants’ documentation may include invoices, proof of delivery, proof of purchase, and any agreements signed or accepted by the cardholder for the transaction.

Incomplete or weak documentation significantly reduces the chances of a successful outcome.

​

Timelines for Chargeback Resolution in India

Chargebacks have different timelines depending on card networks and the type of dispute (i.e., merchant not fulfilling their pledge), and/ or if complications occur during the dispute process.

The cardholder generally will need to file the dispute with the issuing bank/issuer within a certain number of days from either the date of the transaction or the statement date. These time frames vary, usually ranging between 30 and 90 days.

Issuing banks will generally take only a few business days to review the cardholder’s dispute after it has been filed. After this review process is completed, the issuer will issue a chargeback, with the corresponding charge, to the acquiring bank or merchant of record. The respective acquiring bank or business must respond to the chargeback Request submitted by the cardholders within their respective time frames (usually 10 to 30 days).

If a chargeback is not resolved through informal means, then the party’s arbitration may take place. The resolution time frame could be an extended period due to the in-depth review performed during the arbitration stage.

​

Common Chargeback Scenarios in the Indian Market

In India, unauthorized transactions account for a large number of chargebacks because of phishing, security breaches, and social engineering scams.

E-commerce, Travel Booking, and Subscription Service Disputes Related To Services/Products Not Received

Many customers have disputes regarding duplicate billing, incorrect charges for an item or service (incorrect amounts), and unprocessed refunds; however, there are still many instances of customers not receiving their items or services purchased through e-commerce, travel bookings, or subscription services.

Every instance must be carefully documented based on the network rules that apply to each transaction’s type and reason for being disputed.

​

Consumer Errors That Weaken Chargeback Claims

A mistake that many consumers make when disputing a transaction is waiting too long to file a dispute. Some merchants will deny a dispute because it was not filed within their required timeframe.

Many consumers do not reach out to the merchant prior to filing a chargeback for service-related disputes.

Many claims have been denied because the supporting documents were insufficient or inconsistent. Understanding the chargeback process can help consumers avoid these issues.

​

Merchant Risk and Responsibility

Merchants are at risk of losing revenue and reputation if their chargeback ratio is higher than 0%. A high chargeback ratio can lead to increased merchant fees, stricter merchant monitoring, and ultimately termination of a merchant’s relationship with an acquiring bank.

Merchants can significantly lower chargeback risks by having a clear written policy, maintaining accurate and timely records, communicating with customers promptly, and responding to disputes promptly.

​

Escalation and Alternative Remedies

If a cardholder is dissatisfied with the issuer’s resolution, escalation options include the bank’s grievance redressal mechanism, the RBI Banking Ombudsman scheme, and consumer courts.

These channels provide additional protection but operate independently of the card network chargeback process.

​

Impact on Cardholders and Credit Profiles

Legitimate chargebacks do not negatively affect credit scores. However, repeated or abusive disputes may trigger closer scrutiny or account restrictions by issuers.

Responsible use of chargebacks protects both consumers and the payment ecosystem.

​

Final Expert Perspective

Chargebacks are essential to the card payment framework that supports the economy of India. Chargebacks protect consumers from unfair treatment and hold banks and merchants accountable to consumers.

Although the chargeback process is long and complex, its purpose is simple. It gives banks, merchants, and customers a structured way to resolve disputes. The system relies on predetermined rules set by the banking industry, established legal principles, and valid evidence.

Customers must provide enough information to speed up the chargeback process. Merchants, on the other hand, need to respond effectively. They can do this by being transparent in their transactions and maintaining disciplined business practices.

When used properly, the chargeback system builds trust among consumers in India’s electronic payment ecosystem. It also supports the continued growth of safe and secure digital payments across the country’s economy.